Project management system
As of July 2026, Cadylo helps product and engineering teams plan projects around the issues that deliver them. Project status, lead, dates, milestones, health updates, timelines, subscriptions, and live progress remain connected to the team workflow.
Purpose-built for teams managing software product delivery rather than client billing, construction schedules, or enterprise resource portfolios.
Product scope checked against Cadylo 0.10.4 on July 24, 2026
Core workflow
Project reporting becomes unreliable when it is separated from issue execution. Cadylo derives progress from connected work and gives teams explicit places to communicate health and risk.
Give each project a status, lead, start date, target date, and issue scope so people can understand ownership and timing immediately.
Use milestones to make a long project easier to steer, while team cycles provide a shorter operating cadence for the issues in progress.
Publish health updates and retain their history so a stakeholder can see the current label and how the project reached it.
Move between project timelines, team boards, issue lists, saved views, and workspace analytics without recreating the underlying work.
Step by step
The system supports a lightweight rhythm for planning, delivery, and stakeholder updates.
Create the project, name its lead, set its timing, and define milestones that make progress meaningful.
Add the issues that deliver the outcome and organize near-term execution in team cycles.
Use workflows, boards, timelines, relations, and notifications to surface movement and blockers.
Pair computed issue progress with a human health update and delivery analytics.
Decision guide
Cadylo is strongest when the unit of delivery is software product work.
| A strong fit when | Look elsewhere when |
|---|---|
| Projects are delivered through product and engineering issues. | You need employee time sheets, invoicing, utilization, or client profitability. |
| You need milestones, cycles, timelines, health updates, and live progress. | You need construction dependencies, procurement, or physical resource scheduling. |
| Teams need their own workflow while stakeholders need a cross-project view. | You need a portfolio finance system with budget forecasting as the primary job. |
| You want issue history and analytics to support project reporting. |
Clear answers
The short version of the questions teams ask before choosing a workflow or a tool.
A project management system gives teams a shared way to define outcomes, organize work, assign responsibility, track timing and dependencies, communicate progress, and review results. Cadylo specializes that model for software product delivery by connecting projects directly to issues and team workflows.
Project progress is computed from the completion state of issues connected to the project. This keeps the progress indicator tied to the work being delivered, while project health updates let the project lead explain risk, confidence, or context that a percentage cannot capture.
Cadylo supports configurable workflows, kanban boards, manual or automatic one-to-four-week cycles, rollover of unfinished work, estimates, milestones, timelines, and delivery analytics. Teams can use those capabilities for an agile operating rhythm without being forced into one named framework.
No. Cadylo is intentionally focused on product and engineering delivery. It does not position itself as a replacement for time billing, workforce utilization, construction planning, CRM, or enterprise resource management systems.
Continue exploring
Public beta
Create a workspace and use every feature currently available during the public beta.
Create your workspace